Summary of Whose Pathways are They? The Top-down/Bottom-up conundrum of Complementary Pathways for Refugees

This article questions whether the bottom-up aspect of complementary pathways lend them any greater chance of success. It considers the perspective of four interested ‘actors’: communities, national authorities, the international refugee protection regime, and refugees.

The views expressed are those of the author/s, and are not attributable to the host organisations of the Resettlement.Plus website.

Recent Updates

SCOA logo
SCOA CEO Forum: A Conversation about CRISP
The Settlement Council of Australia (SCOA) CEO Forum, A Conversation about CRISP, explored the implementation...
Read full article »
Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 5.18
From Pilot to Permanent: Introducing CRISP as a permanent program
The Community Refugee Sponsorship Australia (CRSA) event, From Pilot to Permanent: Introducing CRISP...
Read full article »
McGill-Queen's University Press
Summary of The Global Refugee Sponsorship Initiative: A Case Study in Canadian Engagement
Launched in 2016, the Global Refugee Sponsorship Initiative (GRSI) supports governments and non-state...
Read full article »