Summary of Whose Pathways are They? The Top-down/Bottom-up conundrum of Complementary Pathways for Refugees

This article questions whether the bottom-up aspect of complementary pathways lend them any greater chance of success. It considers the perspective of four interested ‘actors’: communities, national authorities, the international refugee protection regime, and refugees.

The views expressed are those of the author/s, and are not attributable to the host organisations of the Resettlement.Plus website.

Recent Updates

MPILogoForSocial_3
Summary of Improving Stakeholder Coordination in Refugee Resettlement
Drawn upon interviews with stakeholders from five countries, this study explores the multilevel partnership...
Read full article »
IRAPcropped
Executive Summary of Envisioning a Way Forward: Climate Displacement Legal Strategy Convening
The International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) hosted a two-day gathering with legal scholars, practitioners,...
Read full article »
MPILogoForSocial_3
Engaging Local Voices: Letting Cities Inform National Refugee Resettlement Goals
UPDATE: event notes added. November 14, 2023; 4:00PM CET / 10:00AM ET; online webinar hosted by Migration...
Read full article »